Isle panel mulls future John Bartlett
Erie Times News
The Presque Isle Bay Public Advisory Committee is considering
expanding its education role and seeking greater community
involvement in protecting the bay.
Committee members discussed Monday what steps the panel
needs to take to meet new demands for monitoring the bay
and ensuring its long-term health. The committee decided
to hold a conference in January to further those goals.
The debate comes in the wake of the Environmental Protection
Agency's decision Dec. 5 to upgrade the bay from an "Area
of Concern" to an "Area of Concern in a Recovery Stage,"
a recognition of the successful effort to clean up the waterway's
pollution. Presque Isle Bay is the first Area of Concern
to which the EPA has granted the new recovery-stage designation.
The International Joint Commission, the joint U.S.-Canadian
body that oversees management of the Great Lakes, designated
the bay an Area of Concern in 1991.
The committee's immediate concern is working with the state
Department of Environmental Protection to develop a monitoring
plan for the bay and setting the targets and decision-making
process for the bay's eventual delisting as an Area of Concern.
Those details are to be worked out within the next six months.
But the committee, charged with helping DEP coordinate and
oversee the bay's cleanup, now believes it must evolve and
change to meet the new demands for monitoring the bay and
ensuring its long-term health. On Monday, the committee
was looking at how it will function in the future and involve
the community in protecting the bay.
Committee member Anne Danielski of Pennsylvania Sea Grant
suggested the committee expand its role to focus more on
education and to involve more individuals and groups in
the group's monitoring and educational efforts. Danielski
said widespread community support for a monitoring and restoration
campaign is what the bay needs.
Gannon University professor Rick Diz, a former committee
chairman, agreed. "This committee's work needs to shift
from the bay itself into the watershed," he said.
The actions of every individual who lives within the bay's
watershed affect the health of the bay, he said.
"If this committee can be the center of that shift, I think
that's what we ought to do," Diz said.
Other committee members met Danielski's and Diz's suggestions
with general support, and agreed to hold a conference Jan.
13 to discuss its evolving role and to explore specific
education and community-based programs that would be a part
of its work. The hope is to have a program outline in place
to apply for a state Growing Greener grant in February.
The committee also discussed its future leadership.
Most members supported continuing to have a DEP official
serve as chairman of the advisory committee. Other than
Diz, who headed the committee for two years, a state official
always has held the post.
The committee is unique in that regard among all the Areas
of Concern in the United States, said Kelly Burch, DEP's
current chairman and regional director.
Lori Boughton, chief of DEP's Office of the Great Lakes,
briefly outlined for the committee the monitoring plan that
must be developed and submitted to EPA. She also reviewed
a new $250 million federal program for the Great Lakes that
could provide funding for the ongoing monitoring.
Burch reassured the committee that the recovery stage designation
will not hinder access to federal dollars.
"We are not going to miss out on funds," Burch said. "In
fact, I see additional funding coming to us for this."
This information is posted
for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S.
Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.