Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Lake Erie's low oxygen has scientists stumped, worried

Sunday, June 23, 2002

By Jenni Laidman, Block News Alliance

Something is wrong in Lake Erie.

For 30 years, scientists thought they knew how to manage the pollution that all but killed the lake in the 1960s.

Now, no one is sure how to mount a rescue.

In what one scientist calls the second battle for the environment of Lake Erie, researchers in the United States and Canada launched a $2 million effort last week to find out why Lake Erie's central basin is running out of oxygen. This summer, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency research vessel Lake Guardian will study puzzling changes on the lake.

If oxygen depletion in Lake Erie persists, the results could be massive fish kills and damage to the walleye fishery; toxic algae blooms; smelly, bad-tasting drinking water; and mucky, putrid beaches, said Gerald Matisoff, the Case Western Reserve University geologist who helped organize the research effort.

"It's like going back to the bad old days when Lake Erie was dead," said Glenn Warren, an aquatic biologist at the U.S. EPA's Great Lakes National Program Office in Chicago.

In the 1960s, it was pollution, pure and simple, that choked the life out of the lake. As a result, a gargantuan multimillion-dollar effort over many years finally limited phosphorus pollution. Phosphorus was the chief culprit in the strangling process.

But there are signs that the problem is no longer so simple.

"It's a real cause for concern," said Jan Ciborowski, a biology professor at the University of Windsor, one of 30 researchers attacking the issue. "It means our billions of dollars spent on sewage treatment -- we're losing ground on that. It's a much more serious problem, and requires a much more complicated solution."

"This is the beginning of the second environmental war in Lake Erie," said David Rockwell, a senior scientist at the U.S. EPA's Great Lakes office. "The brakes we thought we had on the system aren't working anymore."

Until recently, the death knell of lakes played out like this: Phosphorus dumping rose. Phosphorus fertilized algae. Algae grew.

But, what's born must die. As massive algae blooms faded and fell to the bottom, their decay took up oxygen. Anoxia -- or the lack of dissolved oxygen, the stuff that fish breathe -- resulted.

None of this is an issue in Lake Erie's shallow 1,200-square-mile western basin. But in the deeper central and eastern basins, summer warms the surface water, which acts as a barrier to the colder, denser bottom water.

"The cold bottom layer is essentially isolated from the atmosphere," said Paul Bertram, an environmental scientist with the Great Lakes National Program Office.

In the eastern basin, the oxygen remains adequate for life, simply because the basin is deeper. The 2,400-square-mile eastern basin has an average depth of 82 feet.

But the 6,300-square-mile central basin is in a reverse "Goldilocks " position -- everything is just wrong. The central basin, at about 60 feet deep, isn't deep enough to absorb the increasing decay rates of algae, and it's not shallow enough to avoid the isolation of the bottom layer in the first place. The central basin extends from Sandusky, Ohio, to Erie, Pa.

What bewilders scientists this time is that low-oxygen, high-phosphorus conditions are not accompanied by a corresponding algae bloom. Such a bloom would account for the low oxygen.

Further, it appears that phosphorus dumping has been relatively flat in recent years, which should have kept oxygen levels high.

"That's very peculiar," said Ciborowski. "Where's that phosphorus coming from? And why do we have no algae, yet lots of phosphorus? So something is wrong."

"Last year we had the most rapid depletion of oxygen in the central basin that we monitored since 1983," Rockwell said. While a few testing stations in the central basin often show anoxic conditions by late August, some stations showed depleted oxygen in early August last year. By late August, oxygen was down all over the central basin.

The question is, why? Research this summer will focus on three central hypotheses for Lake Erie's troubles, Ciborowski said. It may surprise no one that two of the theories put the European invader, the zebra mussel, and its cousin, the quagga mussel, in the equation.

One hypothesis suggests that atmospheric ozone depletion may allow more ultraviolet light to reach deeper into Lake Erie. This may warm more of the lake, reducing the depth of the cool bottom level in the central basin, thus allowing quicker oxygen depletion.

A second hypothesis revolves around the lack of algae blooms despite the high phosphorus levels. The ideas here explore whether mussels eat the algae before it can proliferate, or whether ultraviolet light inhibits algae blooms.

Another theory suggests that petroleum in the water, in the form of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, may damage algae production.

Researchers also will look at whether something other than phosphorus limits algae growth. For instance, lack of available iron may keep algae levels low no matter how much phosphorus fertilizes the lake.

Finally, the culprit may be mussel feces. One hypothesis suggests that as the feces and something called pseudo feces -- essentially matter the mussels spit out. decays, it takes up oxygen, and contributes to anoxia.

No matter which theory -- or which part of which theory -- proves accurate, it appears that the source of Lake Erie's trouble is entirely different from what it was 30 years ago.

"We're talking about changes in the way things are going on inside the lake rather than external changes," said Ciborowski. "If it's all zebra mussels, we're in trouble. I don't know how you would control zebra mussels."

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map