Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Report: Nearby coal-fired plants polluting Lake Michigan
By Anna Johnson
Associated Press
Published GazetteXtra September 20, 2005

CHICAGO - Lake Michigan receives more mercury pollution than any of the four other Great Lakes, according to a draft of a government report released Monday.

The National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration's study, which was released by Rep. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., also suggested that a majority of the mercury pollution comes from coal-fired electric power plants in the states that surround Lake Michigan.

Calling Chicago the mercury "hot spot," Kirk said the report, which he requested from NOAA in June, proves the federal government must compel power plants to reduce their mercury emissions sooner than current government regulations.

"We should not wait as long as the administration would like," Kirk said. "We have to move more quickly."

The Environmental Protection Agency in March imposed requirements for coal-fired power plants to reduce their mercury emissions about 35 percent by 2010 and 70 percent by 2018. The mercury-emission regulations for coal-fired plants, the first in U.S. history, also would allow plants to delay installing pollution controls by purchasing credits from cleaner plants.

Mercury is a toxic metal that settles in waterways and accumulates in fish. It poses a variety of health risks, with the greatest risk of nerve damage to pregnant women, women of childbearing ages and young children.

Coal-fired electrical plants account for 16 of the top 25 sources of Lake Michigan mercury pollution, according to 1999 NOAA data, the most current emission information available. While a majority of Lake Michigan mercury polluters are in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, some of the pollution originates in Texas, Nevada and Kentucky, the draft study said.

The NOAA study is being reviewed by the EPA, which must sign off on it before it is officially released, said Kirk's spokesman Matt Towson.

EPA spokeswoman Eryn Witcher said Monday the agency was continuing to work with NOAA on the study.

Environmental groups also said Monday during an ad hoc Congressional hearing at Chicago's Shedd Aquarium that the NOAA study shows that mercury emission reductions must be enforced sooner than the EPA rule dictates.

"Mercury pollution control technology is known, doable and not that expensive," said Howard Lerner, executive director of the Environmental Law and Policy Center. "The only thing standing in the way is owners of coal plants."

"When it comes to mercury, it's too little, too long," he said.

The power industry and Bush administration have resisted more dramatic mercury emission reductions, saying that implementing technology would do little to help public health.

EPA officials also have had said mercury-contaminated fish from abroad poses the biggest threat.

Midwest Generation Inc. spokesman Charley Parnell said two of the Chicago-based company's six coal-burning power plants in Illinois will conduct tests next year to determine if technology effectively reduces mercury emissions.

"We acknowledge that the first-ever mercury regulation needed to be passed and we're supportive," Parnell said. "But U.S. coal-fire plants account for less than 1 percent of mercury emissions. This is truly a global issue."

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map