Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Street talk: Water Commission follows Machiavellian approach
By Tom Murphy
Green Bay News-Chronicle
08/31/03


Where oh where is the Green Bay Water Commission coming from in its mandates on shared potable water?

A couple of weeks ago we suggested the Commission's driving force favored the Machiavellian approach: divide and conquer. Sure enough, it happened on Aug. 25.

The self-anointed Lord Commissioner decreed that four of the eight suburbs would be invited to share the "surplus" in the upgraded city water line to Lake Michigan. A day later, Water Utility General Manager Bill Nabak was forced to cover the commissioner's traces. He backtracked, saying that idea was not cast in PVC pipe.

At the urging of the self-anointed, commissioners welcomed Allouez, Ashwaubenon, Bellevue and Howard into with its octopodous arms. Discarded were De Pere, Hobart, Lawrence and Ledgeview.

"Split 'em; let them eat cake," said commissioners, echoing their leader. The body would argue that because those four communities abut the city, hookups are easy. If Allouez or Ashwaubenon opted out, they would say, there's no way De Pere could come in without laying more pipe.

Puerile!

If the four "preferred" suburbs buy this latest bit of bilgewater, their governing bodies should go the way of California Gov. Gray Davis.

We trust the four forgot-me-nots will stay with the preferred four and stick together. Their costs for radium clean-up could more than offset any united front that runs a suburban-only pipe to Lake Michigan.

If the suburbs go it alone, it may be more costly for the first 10 or 15 years. But they will have a system that will last at least 75 years, at a bearable overall expense. Who knows, the city may even become a customer some day.

Without any of the suburbs, Green Bay will have little more than the current bird-in-the-hand in 20 years or so. And its worst fears - that its major customers (if there are any left) will drill their own wells when city rates rise - will come true.

At best, the Water Commission's latest machinations are patchwork. They offer a $20 million "upgrade" to its present system for 20 years...at a 25 percent premium to the suburbs who sign on. Economics 101 says ownership supercedes renting.

Bellevue Public Works Director Ron Umentum, who was that community's first administrator (and a darn good one at that) said it best. He called the latest commission babbling a Band-Aid approach.

"I don't believe that there are four communities going along with them. I don't even know if there is one."

Unfortunately, it seems that the majority of Green Bay commissioners are inexorably wed to their fellow member and demagogic spokesperson.

It's time the eight went on their own. They owe it to their electorates and ratepayers.

Green Bay has had a generation or more (and three mayors) to resolve the issue for the betterment of the people it serves.

Water utility commissioners had more than ample time to create a metropolitan authority which, structured along the lines of total assets, would have given the city a ruling hand in all facets.

They failed.

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map