Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Letter: Water Authority will do 'what needs to be done'
Green Bay News-Chronicle

In an open letter to its member communities, the Central Brown County Water Authority said it will do "what needs to be done" to get clean water to its communities, and said no matter what option it takes, water rates will rise in those municipalities.

In the letter, authority president Len Teresinski said "it is expensive to obtain another water source for the communities but it must be done because of the water quantity and quality problems that the municipalities now face, which will only get worse unless another water sources is obtained."

The letter said the authority still believes the best solution is a mutual solution with the city of Green Bay. The two sides have talked for 2 1/2 years about an agreement to buy Green Bay's water piped from Lake Michigan or share new facilities.

It noted Green Bay recently changed its plans to build a new pipeline and returned to an option - additional construction to boost capacity of its present pipe - "that they discarded two years ago."

"It has never made any sense to the authority that each party should go its separate way and build separate raw water pipelines," the letter said.

It listed the authority's proposals to Green Bay:

_ A Modified Contributed Capital option, in which the CBCWA would pay $17.46 million, Green Bay $18.54 million, with the authority paying a sum for "other considerations." Teresinski noted the city would save $11.46 million while the authority would save $10.54 million with the joint larger pipeline.

If forced to build its own pipe, the authority would pay $28 million. The authority serves as a middleman, selling the water, whether from Green Bay's pipe or its own, to the communities which then add to the base purchase rate to cover their own costs.

Teresinski also defended the decision to drop the use of aquifer storage and recovery as an option, citing few short-term benefits and too many risks with the as-yet unapproved technology.

"Green Bay is in position to see if this technology can work with virtually no risks to the city except the actual cost of the pilot test," Teresinski said. "The city, therefore, can afford to wait. The authority has determined that the risks are too great to continue to wait."

He said Green Bay has the right to decide its best long-term solution to its problems.

The complete text of the letter is at

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map