Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

EDITORIAL: New Berlin deserves water
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Published July 5, 2006


Since the town of New Berlin, Wis., returns its wastewater to Lake Michigan, its request for water has merit and should not be dismissed.

City of Milwaukee officials are upset that they were unaware of an application by New Berlin to obtain Lake Michigan water for the western portion of that city. And Milwaukee officials have good reason to be upset; they should have been made aware of the application, especially since it's from a city to which Milwaukee is already supplying water. As one official put it in an e-mail to us, "We can't talk if we're not at the table."

Nevertheless, New Berlin's request for water has merit and should not be dismissed out of hand. The bottom line on taking water out of the natural basin of the Great Lakes is that, generally speaking, it should not be allowed unless it is returned to the basin. New Berlin, already a client of the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, returns its wastewater to the lake. As long as there are no other environmental issues at stake, New Berlin should get the water.

That city faces a Dec. 8 federal deadline to stop pumping radium-laced water from its wells on the western side of the city. A diversion to cover its current municipal system would help meet that deadline, providing safer water for its residents.

Furthermore, because of a general drawdown on the deep aquifer, other communities in the region are under the same deadline, most notably the city of Waukesha, which is also seeking a diversion of water from the lake. But in Waukesha's case, officials are seeking the diversion without returning the water.

Granting water to New Berlin, which would return the water, could ease the pressure that development is putting on the aquifer. The same would apply if most communities east of the divide went from wells to a Lake Michigan water supply. And easing that pressure could in turn reduce the pressure from communities west of the divide for Lake Michigan water.

But when state Department of Natural Resources officials - to whom New Berlin applied - checked with Great Lakes governors on New Berlin's request, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm said she wouldn't even consider it. Which was shortsighted, given the fact that under a new set of rules being considered by those governors, New Berlin would qualify for a diversion.

At the same time, Milwaukee officials are arguing that the DNR is playing fast and loose with rules that state officials themselves proposed in terms of who would be notified and who would be involved when diversion requests were made. Milwaukee officials are asking legitimate questions of the DNR about its process.

Some officials are also asking why a diversion should be approved before the Great Lakes governors' agreement on the new set of rules is ratified by the eight legislatures and Congress. Fair enough, but the answer in New Berlin's case is that its request falls within the spirit of the new agreement and the city does face a very real deadline on the radium issue.

Regional cooperation is essential if southeastern Wisconsin is to grow and compete in the global market. Cooperation isn't a one-way street. The suburbs have to help Milwaukee thrive if they are to thrive. But Milwaukee has to be willing to help the suburbs. And it can do so on water issues.

It already has, having worked out agreements with several suburbs - including New Berlin, and Elm Grove just this spring - on selling water to areas east of the divide. But if the city fights a legitimate request in a case where water would cross the divide but still be returned to the basin, serious damage could still be done to the move toward greater regional cooperation.


 

 

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map