
Success Stories:
Student Sleuths Discover Pollution Sources
By Jim Rutkowski
|
..... |
Bank stabilization
project
|
Strong Vincent High School
Jim Rutkowski, Teacher
1330 West 8th Street
Erie, PA 16510
Phone: 814-874-6522 Fax: 814-874-6507
E-mail: jrutkowski@eriesd.iu5.org
-or- jk.touch@verizon.net
Presque Isle Bay, a Great
Lakes Area of Concern, was so designated because of the
high rate of tumors and skin discolorations in the Brown
Bullhead populations. Core sampling of the Bay by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PDEP)
and the U.S. EPA showed elevated levels of phenylalanine
hydroxylase (PAHs), and research indicated that these
chemicals may be the cause of the tumors. The
problem was that the exact source of these pollutants
was not known. The problem has been ongoing for over 10
years, with fish tumors first reported in the mid-80s.
We began our work in 1997
and completed the final stage of our project in the Fall
of 2001. Using the latest technology, students at Strong
Vincent High School used a scientific technique called
immunoassay testing to determine the PAH levels in the
waters and sediments of Cascade Creek, a tributary of
the Bay. The original funding allowed us to narrow the
possible location of the contaminants and determine that
most of the PAHs were introduced into the waterway during
heavy rains, leading us to believe that erosion played
an important role in the process.
Our results have been far
greater than ever expected. Using our samples and test
results, a Big Ten University (Penn State) conducted their
own testing and verified our results. These were then
passed on to members of the PDEP, the Pennsylvania Great
Lakes Office, the Erie County Health Department, and a
local sportsman’s group, the SONS of Lake Erie. The one
area located as a potential source of the PAHs was also
to become the site of a new commercial building, a convenience
store/gas station owned and operated by Country Fair.
With the cooperation of
all involved, the contaminated soil was removed to a depth
of 8 feet, bank stabilization devices were installed,
and a riparian buffer zone was created. The success of
the work made able by the original grant was used to acquire
additional funding, and further testing located a major
source of the pollutant, which, again, was confirmed.
These findings led to the redesign of a commercial building
site on that location, which included a major bank stabilization
project and the creation of a riparian buffer zone. During
the entire process, the students at Strong Vincent played
an active role, from monitoring to planning meetings to
the actual planting of the buffer zone.
What do you consider
the key to your success?
First was the scientific
approach taken by the students. They utilized the proper
collection techniques and carefully followed the complicated
test procedures. Their work enabled us to determine the
mechanism by which the pollutants entered the waterways.
Second was returning the
next year to test the soils along the banks, determine
the areas of highest concentration, and have these results
confirmed.
Finally, the cooperation
and team-building of all parties involved allowed our
results to influence-in a positive way - the construction
of a commercial site and the reduction of the pollutant
into the waterway.
How would you outline
the steps you took to organize your project in order to
advise another group working on a similar project?
1. Research the latest technology
and determine what your group can realistically do
2. Follow standard procedures
and techniques. Sloppy work may raise doubt that your
findings are accurate.
3. Confirm your findings.
4. Let others know what
you are doing and why.
5. Form a team that will
use the results to improve the environment. Don’t finger-point.
Work together.
What have the effects
of this effort been on your school’s work?
Our school is now considered
the Environmental Theme School for our district, and the
students of Strong Vincent High have been invited to participate
in a number of college-level research projects and to
work with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection. We continue to be a leader in environmental
education in our area.
How has the project affected
your community?
The bank stabilization project
and riparian buffer zone are visible from two major travel
arteries and have been highlighted on TV and in newspaper
articles. The erosion control/buffer project has prompted
others to look at ways to reduce possible pollution sources
along Lake Erie and in the Lake Erie Watershed. Additionally,
our school won the "Three Rivers Environmental Excellence
Award" in education in 1999.
After winning the award,
I* have been invited to a number of places to give presentations
on our students’ work on this aquatic habitat protection
project. In fact, on April 3, 2002, I attended the East
Coast Regional Meeting of the Partnership for Environmental
Technology Education to talk about our students’ participation
and to encourage others to get involved. *Jim Rutkowski,
Supervising Teacher
What particular stumbling
blocks, challenges, or defeats did you encounter?
The only major block was
getting the permission to enter private land to acquire
the samples. Having the students contact the owners proved
to be a good way of getting permission.
How many people were
involved?
(a) Initially: 40
(b) Finally: Over 200
Approximately 400 hours
were spent on the original grant. For the total projects,
well over 2,000 people-hours were devoted.
How was public involvement
motivated and facilitated?
Public involvement was provided
through the team we built to determine a way to solve
the problem. Local government agencies, state personnel,
and area environmentalists worked to confirm the results
and then invited Country Fair (the developer) to discuss
the problem and ask for their support to help solve it.
How was public education
a component of your program?
Strong Vincent High School
is a public high school, and we used available methods
within the high school (bulletin boards, school announcements,
student-to-student discussions, etc.) to explain and promote
our project.
What was the primary
means of communication?
There were a number of meetings
held in the Erie area, some at the high school, that brought
all the team members together. It took over a year of
planning, encompassing many means of communication, to
change the original building site into one that protected
the environment.
What resources were
available/acquired/tapped into?
The original work was funded
through the Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund
($3,500) and the Pennsylvania League of Women Voters ($3,000).
The second year of funding was provided by International
Paper’s EDCORE Fund ($9,000). A portion of the bank stabilization
project was funded through the Pennsylvania Growing Greener
Fund ($94,000). Additional volunteer support came from
the SONS of Lake Erie, the Pennsylvania Lake Erie Watershed
Association, and students from Strong Vincent High School.
What level and types
of media exposure were you able to obtain?
Local television stations
and newspapers carried the results of our testing and
the construction of the stabilization devices.
Other comments to help
other schools or grassroots organizations working on similar
projects.
With all the technology
that is out there, it is not impossible for grassroots
organizations to conduct a series of tests for various
water pollutants. Though tests administered by students
are not EPA-approved, they provide the jump-start for
further research by the proper authorities. The person-hours
that an organization can provide may be useful in narrowing
down the often-elusive sources of nonpoint source pollutants.
Strong Vincent High School
Jim Rutkowski, Teacher
1330 West 8th Street
Erie, PA 16510
Phone: 814-874-6522 Fax: 814-874-6507
E-mail: jrutkowski@eriesd.iu5.org
-or- jk.touch@verizon.net
|