Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Seaway report leaves unanswered questions
By Brian Dwyer
News10Now.com (NY)
Posted November 27, 2007


CLAYTON, N.Y. -- It started out with heated debate. Should the St. Lawrence Seaway be expanded to allow bigger ships though? The debate became a full fledged American and Canadian study with the Army Corp of Engineers.

Groups like Save The River in Clayton say expanding the locks and rivers would only cause more environmental problems.

When a final report on the study was released late Monday night, and it made no mention of physical expansion, Save The River said it was a small victory. But the fact it wasn't officially eliminated either, is a bit confusing.

"Expansion of the river is just a bad idea." Save The River Executive Director Jennifer Caddick said. "We would like to see the initial recommendations to pursue physical expansion of the seaway rescinded and removed from further study."

Save The River admits it hasn't had time to really sink its teeth into the report, but it quickly recognized the report's wish to increase the amount of smaller shipping traffic. Saying only half of it is being utilized.

"Increased focus on short-sea shipping will better integrate the GLSLS with road and rail systems, while providing shippers with a cost-effective, timely and reliable means to transport goods." The report said on a press release.

And while the report also mentions preserving the ecosystem, Caddick believes adding more ships might make that difficult.

"We would have to understand what that traffic is coming from." Caddick replied. "We certainly don't want to see more ocean-going vessels because those bring with them invasive species introduction."

In the next couple of days, Save The River says it plans to form a committee of its own to do an in-depth analysis of the full report.
Once it does that, it will submit comments and questions that it says need to be answered.

The report also recommends spending tens of millions of dollars annually on repair and maintenance on the Seaway facilities.

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map