Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Editorial: New invasive species bills have merit
One bill stands out as the better long-term solution.
The Minnesota Daily
Published October 26, 2005



T wo feuding bills fighting their way through Congress, both claiming to alleviate the problem of invasive species in the Great Lakes, deserve serious consideration.
Currently, ships are required to exchange their ballast water when they move in and out of the Great Lakes area in an effort to minimize the number of invasive organisms that make it into the lakes ó organisms such as zebra mussels, which have made themselves infamous by wreaking havoc all the way down the Mississippi River ecosystem.

The efforts are commendable but not effective enough. Organisms can still survive in the residual water that cannot be completed removed from the ships, so newer methods are needed to protect the lakesí native species.

The first bill, the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act, is sponsored by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and cosponsored by Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn. It seems to be stagnant and needs a jump-start in the Senate. The act aims to phase out ballast water exchange and instead develop treatments that will safely kill invasive organisms. It also calls for research on invasive pathways and screening live organisms in the aquatic animal trade. Overall, this bill seems to call for a comprehensive solution for the problem at hand.

The competing bill, the Ballast Water Management Act, has already made it through the Senate Commerce Committee. It calls for much more stringent standards than those currently imposed, but will take more time to implement and keeps ballast exchange as the main safeguard against invasive species.

Officials from the National Wildlife Federationís Great Lakes Natural Resource Center call the National Aquatic Invasive Species Act imperative to protect the lakesí ecosystem from collapse. Even now, a new invasive species enters the lakes every eight months. Shipping groups are split on which legislation is better. But Levin and Daytonís bill seems to provide the best long-term solutions and deserves more support than it has received so far. Invasive species can devastate an ecosystem by impacting economics and native wildlife. Congress must choose the solution that will best keep our nationís biodiversity intact.

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map