Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

Proposal aims to restrict diversion of Great Lakes
By Don Davis
Forum Communications Co.
Published Wednesday, January 17, 2007


ST. PAUL – A proposed agreement to greatly restrict movement of water in and out of the Great Lakes basin generally won’t affect Minnesota, supporters say.

The only effect would be that “we can’t relax our laws” dealing with water, Rep. Tom Huntley, DFL-Duluth, said.

The House Environment and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday unanimously passed a bill approving a compact among eight Great Lakes states. The compact still must be approved by other House and Senate committees. It also must win support in other states bordering the lakes, not to mention congressional passage and a presidential signature.

Despite the red tape awaiting the compact, Huntley and other supporters said legislation is important.

“It would prevent any significant amount of diversion,” said Huntley, past president of the Great Lakes Commission.

However, it would allow communities such as some on the Iron Range to continue to pump from wells on the Lake Superior side of the continental divide and discharge sewage on the other side.

The compact would prevent any significant new or increased use of Great Lakes water outside the basin.

Too many people are not concerned about Superior, said Allison Wolf of the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy. “Vastness can make the lake seem invulnerable, but that would be misleading.”

Through the years, there have been proposals to use Superior water for other uses, including recent talk that pipelines could be built along Interstate 35 to supply water to Texans. That would not be allowed under the compact. Neither would shipping Superior water to ethanol plants in Minnesota’s farm belt.

No opposition has surfaced for the compact in Minnesota and Huntley predicted it will pass all eight states by the end of 2008.

Two Canadian provinces on the Great Lakes already have agreed to the compact’s terms and their federal government is considering the document.

Readers can reach Forum Communications reporter Don Davis at (651) 290-0707 or ddavis@forumcomm.com



This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map