|
Great Lakes
Article:
Region tops EPA list of mercury
pollution
By Laura Johnston
The Journal Gazette
01/11/04
Somewhere north of Fort Wayne lies an area of nearly
500 square miles considered to be the most mercury-contaminated
spot in the country, according to figures from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Defense, a private non-profit organization,
released the figures - compiled earlier by the EPA, but
never published - in December, listing the 484-square-mile
"hot spot" as leading the country in mercury
deposits.
Mercury accumulates in fish and can threaten the development
of infants and fetuses when consumed.
The report was released days before the EPA proposed
its first regulations to cut mercury emissions from power
plants. But environmentalists believe the regulations
are not strict enough.
Report sketchy on source
Using data from 1998, the Environmental Defense report
is based on a complicated computer model that analyzed
weather patterns, mercury emissions from area coal-fired
power plants and other information, said Michael Shore,
a senior policy analyst for Environmental Defense.
The report from Environmental Defense, a national organization
of 400,000 members founded in 1967, does not give a source
for the contamination. Nor does it specifically define
the hot-spot area by county lines or municipal boundaries.
Instead, the report used mapping done by the EPA that
divided the country into 22-mile-by-22-mile square grids.
The checkerboard square with the most mercury deposits
was a grid ambiguously described as being north of Fort
Wayne, Shore said.
"It's not a precise spot," he said. "When
you look at the specific sites, when you look at the states
in the Midwest and the East, there are hot spots all over.
. . . The places where mercury deposition is highest,
local sources dominate."
Shore blamed the coal-fired power plants in Indiana,
as well as plants in northeast Illinois and western Ohio,
for the contamination. Hot spots also are located in Michigan,
Maryland, Florida, Illinois and Pennsylvania.
Indiana is home to 23 coal-fired power plants, more than
any state except Pennsylvania, Ohio and Illinois, said
Leise Jones, field director for the Indiana Public Interest
Research Group.
The group, which is staffed mainly by students at Indiana
University in Bloomington, recently released figures that
showed Indiana was responsible for the country's fourth-largest
amount of mercury pollution.
According to the report - written by a coalition called
Clear the Air and based on EPA data - the plants released
5,728 pounds of mercury in 2001.
About 91,000 pounds of mercury was emitted nationwide,
the report states.
Residents 'not at risk'
People who live near the hot spot shouldn't panic, Shore
said.
"People in northeast Indiana aren't necessarily
at greater risk," he said. "However, it is emblematic
that there is a lot of mercury pollution coming to that
area."
Residents should not be concerned about digesting mercury
through drinking water or absorbing it from soil. They
should, however, restrict the amount of fish they eat,
especially locally caught fish.
Mercury exists naturally in coal, and when coal is burned,
it dissipates in the air. It mixes with rainand falls
to the ground and into rivers and streams, where a biological
process transforms it into a highly toxic form that builds
up in fish, according to the EPA.
People are exposed to mercury mainly by eating fish at
the top of the food chain, such as bass, carp, pike and
swordfish. The mercury in the fish can cause birth defects
and developmental disorders in young children, Jones said.
Fish consumption advisories issued by the Indiana Department
of Health are especially strict for young children, pregnant
and nursing women, and women who might have children in
the next six years.
Health department officials in Allen County and in the
mercury hot spot north of Fort Wayne stress moderation
in fish consumption.
"My understanding is the amount of fish flesh you'd
have to consume to be any issue is certainly more than
anybody would consume," Noble County Health Officer
Gerald Warrener said.
State advisories recommend that children and pregnant
women never eat carp from Indiana rivers and streams.
Andy Knott, air and energy policy director for the Hoosier
Environmental Council, called the advisories "a travesty."
"It's shameful that we can't freely consume fish
out of our supposedly fresh waters," Knott said.
"It can be avoided. We don't have to have fish contaminated
with mercury."
Turning concern into results
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management is
aware of the mercury issue, which it considers a national
problem, spokeswoman Laura Pippenger said.
The agency is working with the EPA to find out how it
gathered and interpreted the data that indicated the northeast
Indiana hot spot.
"This sort of modeling can have discrepancies that
can indicate a hot spot like this," Pippenger said.
But the Environmental Defense study shows that mercury
pollution is caused by power plants nearby, Shore said.
"It travels to some extent, but communities that
live around the power plants are most at risk to mercury
pollutants," said Jones, of the Indiana Public Interest
Group.
Shore and Jones hope that information will convince the
Bush administration to enact tough regulations on power
plants.
"If we're going to clean up pollution, . . . we
need to reduce mercury from local sources," Shore
said.
The EPA in December introduced two proposals to cut mercury
emissions.
One proposal would decrease emissions 30 percent by 2008.
The other, called a "cap and trade" approach,
would cut emissions nationwide 70 percent by 2018. It
allows power companies to buy and sell emission credits,
allowing some power plants to cut emissions by less than
70 percent if other plants slash emissions more.
The EPA favors the second proposal, spokesman John Millett
said.
"There's still a lot of science to be done to be
absolutely certain to make sure how mercury emissions
behave in the atmosphere and how they deposit," he
said. "What we do know is that this first regulation
proposed to reduce mercury from power plants will certainly
help the environment, and we'll see environmental improvement.
"That's the important part," he said. "We
can address local issues as we get more information on
them, but this is an important first step."
Fossil-fuel-fired power plants are the largest source
of human-generated mercury emissions in the United States,
according to the EPA.
American Electric Power releases 10 percent of all power
plant mercury emissions, making it the country's largest
contributor, according to the Clear the Air report.
"We're probably a large emitter of mercury because
we're the largest generator of electricity in the country,
and a lot of our electricity comes from coal," American
Electric Power spokeswoman Melissa McHenry said.
Plants pushed to action
McHenry said that mercury pollution is a global issue
and that mercury levels in the United States are significantly
affected by global emissions. She said there's no commercially
available technology to cut mercury emissions that would
work in every power plant.
And whatever emissions the industry does cut, "it's
not going to have a huge impact."
But Knott, of the Hoosier Environmental Council, disagrees.
"Mercury does travel some distance, so it's impossible
to say exactly what power plants it's coming from,"
he said. "It's safe to say the overall problem is
from those sources."
Knott, like other environmentalists, wants to see President
Bush sign laws to cut mercury emissions in power plants
by 90 percent by 2008.
He also dislikes the idea of emissions trading favored
by the EPA because, Knott said, unlike sulfur and acid
rain, mercury emissions remain local.
"What the Bush administration is proposing is too
little, too late," he said. "It's 10 more years
of contamination and in the end, still more contamination."
U.S. Rep. Mark Souder, R-Fort Wayne, said the hot spot
is something the government should investigate.
"It's a warning sign," he said, "even
if it's just hypothetical."
|