Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Grants Program Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

FDA Under Fire for Mercury in Fish Advice
By Lauran Neergaard
AP Medical Writer
12/10/03

WASHINGTON -- Consumer advocates are again urging the government to advise pregnant women to limit tuna consumption, arguing that some varieties contain more potentially harmful mercury than others.

But the Food and Drug Administration, which plans to issue new consumer advice on mercury in fish next spring, says stronger warnings are not needed.

Fish, including tuna, is very nutritious. Many species contain certain
fats called omega-3s that are very heart-healthy and important for
fetal brain development. The American Heart Association recommends eating fish twice a week.

But fish also can harbor mercury, a metal that accumulates in the
bodies of fish-eaters and can damage the growing brains of fetuses and young children. About 8 percent of U.S. women of childbearing age have enough mercury in their blood to put a fetus at risk.

Some fish varieties harbor more mercury than others. The FDA has long told women who may become pregnant to avoid shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish.

But the FDA in 2001 said a few servings a week -- totaling 12 ounces --
of any other fish is healthy during pregnancy. That sparked fierce
criticism from consumer advocates who argue that tuna, with moderately high mercury levels, is eaten so often by pregnant women and young children that it needed warnings, too.

In 2002, the FDA's own advisers recommended saying that two 6-ounce cans of tuna a week is fine if that's the only fish pregnant women eat; a single can is OK if they eat other fish, the agency said.

The FDA released its new fish testing data on Tuesday, showing that
more expensive white, or albacore, canned tuna contains almost three times as much mercury than cheaper "light" canned tuna.

Drafts of new consumer advice the agency is planning don't spell out
that difference -- or heed the 2002 recommendation. Instead, the FDA
plans to tell pregnant women that mercury levels in tuna vary and that tuna steaks and canned albacore "generally contain higher levels of mercury than canned light tuna."

The new advice also stresses eating a variety of fish, not the same
type more than once a week, said Dr. David Acheson, the FDA's medical officer in charge of the issue. But it doesn't single out limits for tuna.

"We believe that if people follow what's written in the advisory, there
will be a significant level of protection," he said.

That doesn't go far enough, consumer advocates plan to tell the FDA's
advisers this week.

"They've completely failed in their obligation to protect the public,"
said Richard Wiles of the Environmental Working Group, which plans a
legal challenge if the FDA doesn't change its position.

He said a single 6-ounce can of albacore a week could put many women, depending on their size, over the safe mercury limit.

Mercury accumulates in fish over time; canned light tuna comes from
small fish, albacore and steaks from large ones.

Eleven states already tell pregnant women to limit consumption of
canned tuna, and Rhode Island last summer told them to avoid albacore, said Michael Bender of the Mercury Policy Project.

Nobody actually knows how much tuna or other mercury-containing fish
pregnant women and young children eat today. But last year tuna slipped from the most-eaten seafood to No. 2, replaced by shrimp.

Even though albacore has more mercury than light tuna, it still
contains levels well below the FDA's safe limits, stressed Dave Burney of the U.S. Tuna Foundation.

"Albacore tuna happens to have more omega-3 in it than any other fish," he said. "Any advice for women to not eat fish is the wrong message to send."

But Consumers Union is urging the FDA to rewrite its advice and tell
consumers what the lowest-mercury options are -- such as crab, catfish, flounder, salmon and shrimp -- instead of focusing just on what to avoid.

"The message should be, 'Eat more fish for your health while minimizing
your mercury intake,'" said Consumers Union scientist Edward Groth.

Also, parents need to know how much fish is safe for young children, he said. The FDA's planned advice just says they should eat less than
adults.

Tuna aside, the FDA's draft advice does warn that fish caught from
local lakes and rivers often contains more mercury than commercial fish
-so heed local warnings on which freshwater fish to avoid. If there is
no advice for your area, eat no more than 6 ounces of locally caught
fish a week, the draft says.

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map