DISTINGUISHING
BETWEEN EXEMPTED, REGULATED, AND ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
There
are many types of activities that, while detrimental
to wetlands, are exempted from regulation, either
having been specifically permitted in some public
code, such as filling a wetland in order to build
a logging road 1, having been specifically exempted
from regulation, or having not been mentioned at
all in any law or regulation, such as mowing wetland
vegetation 2. In the case of an exempted activity,
the situation is not hopeless for a citizen who
wants to protect the wetland. Here are some recommended
courses of action:
1) Educate
the landowner or the party carrying out the destructive
actions in the wetland. Persuade him that the wetland
is worth protecting and work with him to find alternatives
to the action.
2) See if the action is dependent upon some local
zoning ordinance. If so, work through the local
zoning process to protect the wetland.
Citizens
who observe a questionable activity in a wetland
can find out from their state’s or province’s regulatory
agency whether the activity is exempted. See the
section on your state or province for details and
contact information.
At the
other end of the spectrum, many activities are strictly
illegal, meaning that people are not allowed to
do them under any circumstances. One example of
an illegal wetland activity is mowing a county road
ditch that has purple loosestrife growing in it
3 or filling in a wetland for the sole purpose of
creating an upland 4 (wetland permits to fill for
other purposes can be issued however).
In
between the activities that people may do and those
that people simply are not allowed to do are a plethora
of activities that people are allowed to do, provided
they obtain a permit. These types of activities
are called regulated activities. The purpose for
regulating certain activities is to allow a governing
body to ensure that the activities are done in such
a way as to minimize their impacts on wetlands.
At the state/provincial and federal levels, most
permits are granted, but the government and, ostensibly,
the people still have some oversight in order to
protect wetlands by avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating
wetland impacts.
|