Great Lakes Environmental Directory Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes grants exotic species water pollution water export drilling environment Great Lakes pollution Superior Michigan Huron Erie Ontario ecology Great Lakes issues wetlands Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Great Lakes environment Great Lakes watershed water quality exotic species Great Lakes grants water pollution water export oil gas drilling environment environmental Great Lakes pollution Lake Superior Lake Michigan Lake Huron Lake Erie Lake Ontario Great Lakes ecology Great Lakes issues Great Lakes wetlands Great Lakes Resources Great Lakes activist Great Lakes environmental organizations Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat air pollution alien species threatened rare endangered species ecological Great Lakes information Success Stories Great Lakes Directory Home/News Great Lakes Calendar Great Lakes jobs/volunteering Search Great Lakes Organizations Take Action! Contact Us Resources/Links Great Lakes Issues Great Lakes News Article About Us Networking Services

Great Lakes Article:

World-Wide Efforts To Privatize Water Market Viewed With Alarm As Public Users Lose Their Voice
Jane Kelly
Sacramento Bee

Multinational corporations vie for a share of the American water market, and if they are given the opportunity, affordable drinking water may soon be a thing of the past. From Stockton, to Atlanta, to Cochabamba, Bolivia, privatization has proven a risky business with far-reaching consequences.

As budgets everywhere are slashed, there is increasing pressure to hand over public utilities to private firms. Politicians want a quick fix and are buying into the hype of giant water firms offering the capital to invest in needed upgrades. These corporations claim to be the solution to the growing global water crisis. In truth, the consumer is the one who pays.

The City Council in Stockton [California] approved a $600 million, 20-year contract with OMI-Thames, a multinational partnership that's British-based and German-owned, but citizens are battling to protect their water and to have a say in its management. When they learned that Mayor Gary Podesto was pushing privatization, they gathered 18,000 signatures calling for a public ballot on the privatization issue.

Local water experts were highly critical of the bid, and the former director of Stockton's Municipal Utilities Department (MUD), Morris Allen, charged that city officials ordered him to shred important
documents related to the deal. These papers reportedly showed that it would be cheaper for Stockton to continue managing its own water system. Allen says he also was asked to inflate MUD's operating costs to make a bid by OMI-Thames look better.

To pre-empt the forthcoming ballot measure, the mayor fast-tracked City Council approval of the OMI-Thames contract, saying the issue was too complex for voters. The council, 4-3, approved the contract on February 19. But in a special election on March 4, Stockton citizens disagreed, voting to maintain control of their water system. However, because the election came after the council's quick vote the contract, activists have gathered another 12,000 signatures to qualify a referendum that would allow voters to overturn the City Council's vote.

In Atlanta, officials thought they could save money on repairs by contracting with United Water, a French-owned firm, to buy and run Atlanta's system. In the first four years of a 20-year contract,
residents complained of rate hikes, brown water and poor service. Operating fees and complaints cost the city tens of millions of dollars, even while United Water was billing the city for work it didn't do. In
January, Atlanta pulled the plug on that deal.

Water shakedowns are especially risky now that global corporations can use far-reaching international trade agreements to their advantage. When San Francisco-based Bechtel took over water management in Bolivia in 1999, bills soared so high that farmers could no longer irrigate their fields and citizens staged massive protests. Many were injured and one demonstrator was killed. The government canceled its contract. Bechtel is now suing the poorest country in South America at a secret World Bank tribunal to recoup "lost profits." The press, the public and citizens of Bolivia have been denied admittance to proceedings.

This is what happens when water is a commodity for sale to the highest bidder. The people lose their voice -- not only in developing countries, but also in Stockton, California.

A corporation's chief goal is to make a profit, which is often invested into new projects oceans apart from the community where the corporation operates --- or simply pocketed. In Stockton's case, Thames Water likely will use profits to solve its German parent company's financial woes. If Stockton retains public control of its water system, those same profits could have been invested in the community. If and when consumers pay their first water bill to OMI-Thames, they should question what they're paying for.

Jane Kelly is the director of the West Coast office of Public Citizen, a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization. She can be reached at or

This information is posted for nonprofit educational purposes, in accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Chapter 1,Sec. 107 copyright laws.
For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Great Lakes environmental information

Return to Great Lakes Directory Home/ Site Map